Native American class action lawsuit settled for $3.4 billion

June 29, 2011 by

District Judge Thomas Hogan late on Monday announced approval of the settlement for Cobell v. Salazar, which found the Department of Interior mismanaged lands held in trust on behalf of Native Americans.  The total award will exceed $3.4 billion.

The suit was originally settled in December 2009 and then approved by Congress in November, 2010.

The judge’s approval will allow hundreds of thousands of Native Americans who had Individual Indian Money accounts, an interest in trust, or restricted land managed by the Interior Department to receive payments of at least $1,000 each, said a statement released by Interior.

Parts of the settlement will go toward buying interest in trust lands and a scholarship fund.

“The Cobell settlement not only resolves the contentious 15-year litigation, but also honorably and responsibly turns the page on an unfortunate chapter in the Department’s history,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in the statement.

In a statement from the White House, President Barack Obama said: “Resolving this dispute was a priority for my Administration, and we will engage in government-to-government consultations with tribal nations regarding the land consolidation component … to ensure that this moves ahead at an appropriate pace and in an appropriate manner.”

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, consumer cases, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, employment matters, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.