Another settlement in auto parts antitrust class action – this one with Bosch

September 28, 2017 by

Consumers recently filed a motion for preliminary approval of a settlement with Bosch. Bosch has agreed to pay $33.4 million to settle antitrust lawsuits involving four different types of auto parts.

The parts involved in the Bosch settlement are windshield wiper systems, starters, fuel injection systems, and spark plugs.

The settlement, if approved, will have four separate settlement classes: one for each of the four auto parts. The classes will include anyone who, between Jan. 1, 2000, and the execution of the settlement, bought or leased a new vehicle that had the relevant part, or bought one or more of the parts as a replacement.

Most of the $33.4 million would be allocated to members of the spark plug class, who would receive $29 million. About $2.9 million would go to members of the fuel injector class, $1 million would go to the members of the starters class and about $508,000 would go to members of the windshield wiper class.

Stoll Berne filed the class action on behalf of the Oregon class.

The cases are In re: Windshield Wiper Systems, case number 2:13-cv-00903; In re: Starters, case number 2:13-cv-01103; In re: Fuel Injection Systems, case number 2:13-cv-02203; and In re: Spark Plugs, case number 2:15-cv-03003, while the MDL is In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, case number 2:12-md-02311, all in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, consumer cases, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, employment matters, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.