Class Actions Blog

Archive for the ‘Breaking News’ Category

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposes rule to supervise larger participants in consumer debt collection and consumer reporting markets

Posted on: February 24th, 2012 by Steve Larson

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today announced a proposed rule to include debt collectors and consumer reporting agencies under its nonbank supervision program.  This would mark the first time these important and far-reaching consumer financial market participants are subject to federal supervision.

“Consumer financial products and services have become more complex over the years and they have expanded well beyond traditional banks,” said Richard Cordray, CFPB Director.  “Our proposed rule would mean that those debt collectors and credit reporting agencies that qualify as larger participants are subject to the same supervision process that we apply to the banks.  This oversight would help restore confidence that the federal government is standing beside the American consumer.” Read more…

Two senators introduce bill to allow suits v. cell companies

Posted on: October 14th, 2011 by Steve Larson

Two senators introduced a bill on October 4, to prohibit wireless companies from having clauses in contracts that prohibit consumers from suing the companies because of hidden fees or other contract disputes.

Senators Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Al Franken of Minnesota introduced the measure, which would ban the common practice of putting clauses in wireless phone and data contracts that require consumers to use binding arbitration in the case of a dispute. Read more…

Chambers rates Stoll Berne as a top litigation firm

Posted on: August 12th, 2011 by Steve Larson

Once again, Chambers USA rates Stoll Berne as a top litigation firm in Oregon for 2011.  Stoll Berne is listed in Band 1 (the highest level recognized by Chambers.)

Chambers notes that its sources say “the team is responsive, intelligent and innovative.”  Gary Berne is considered “among the top business litigators in Portland” and Rob Shlachter is described by peers as “an outstanding litigator who gets tremendous results.”  Keith Ketterling, Steve Larson and Robert Stoll have also been recognized as top litigation attorneys.

David Lokting, in our real estate practice, is described as “a smart and brilliant lawyer.”

Stoll Berne attorneys honored by 2011 Oregon Super Lawyers

Posted on: July 14th, 2011 by Steve Larson

STOLL BERNE proudly announces that twelve of the firm’s attorneys have been selected as either 2011 Oregon Super Lawyers or Rising Stars.

Lawyers recognized in the Oregon Super Lawyers list include: Gary Berne, Tim DeJong, Keith Ketterling, Steve Larson, David Lokting, Rob Shlachter, Scott Shorr and Robert Stoll.

Elizabeth Tedesco Milesnick, Yoona Park, Josh Ross and Jennifer Wagner have all been recognized in the Rising Stars list; and both Rob Shlachter and Tim DeJong as being in the top fifty lawyers in Oregon.

Only five percent of Oregon lawyers are recognized by Super Lawyers each year and only 2.5 percent are recognized on the Rising Stars list.  Independent polling, research and selection are performed by Thomson Reuters.

U.S. Supreme Court reverses Wal-Mart, Inc. v. Dukes

Posted on: June 20th, 2011 by Steve Larson

On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. Dukes reversed a class certification order in a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart filed on behalf of current and former female employees of Wal-Mart.  As reported earlier on this blog, the trial court had  certified a class representing approximately 1.5 million female employees at Wal-Mart stores throughout the country. The workers sued the nation’s largest private employer for sex discrimination in Wal-Mart’s pay, promotions, and other employment practices, alleging that employer policies delegating authority to make subjective and discretionary employment decisions allowed for widespread discrimination against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The complaint seeks injunctive relief and declaratory relief, punitive damages, and backpay. It did not seek compensatory damages. Read more…

US Supreme Court rules that arbitration agreements can bar class action lawsuits

Posted on: April 27th, 2011 by Steve Larson

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in AT&T v. Concepcion, which I wrote about earlier in this blog, ruling that arbitration agreements can bar class action lawsuits. In its 5-4 decision, the Court, in effect, reversed the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P.3d 1100 (2005).  In Discover Bank, the California Supreme Court held that class action waivers in consumer arbitration agreements are unconscionable if the agreement is an adhesion contract, disputes between the parties are likely to involve small amounts of damages, and the party with inferior bargaining power alleges a deliberate scheme to defraud.  The 5-4 majority found that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California law. Read more…

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.

About Class Actions:

About this blog

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

About the author

  • Steve Larson

  • Steve Larson
  • Steve Larson has been representing investors, consumers and employees in class actions in Oregon for over 20 years. He is a shareholder at the law firm of Stoll Berne in Portland, Oregon.
Follow stollberne on Twitter

Subscribe to this blog