Class Actions Blog

Author Archive

Wells Fargo not making loan modifications in accord with settlement

Posted on: December 28th, 2012 by Steve Larson

House key ring vectorAccusing Wells Fargo & Co. of reneging on a sweeping mortgage-modification deal, a lawyer for troubled homeowners is trying to reopen a case involving risky “pick-a-pay” loans written during the housing bubble.

Legal filings last week claimed Wells Fargo failed to provide wide-ranging reductions of loan balances to delinquent borrowers as it had promised two years ago when it settled a combined national class-action suit. A bank spokeswoman strongly disputed the claim, saying it was riddled with errors. Read more…

Jake Zamansky recently wrote the following article in Forbes Magazine

Posted on: December 19th, 2012 by Steve Larson

In the movie “A Civil Action” John Travolta played a scrappy lawyer who risks his whole practice to bring a class action case against a chemical company that polluted the water and poisoned residents in a small Massachusetts town. The movie ends badly for both the lawyer and the company.

Class actions are a vehicle through which individuals harmed by fraudulent conduct of companies and Wall Street firms can seek redress as a large group, thus sharing the costs and expenses, which they could not do if they all brought their own individual suits. In addition to shareholder class actions, the class action vehicle has been used by groups of employees to redress discrimination by companies and, in the medical area, to seek compensation for defective medical and pharmaceutical products which cause widespread harm. Read more…

Toll Brothers settles shareholder class action

Posted on: December 18th, 2012 by Steve Larson

Officials at luxury-home builder Toll Brothers Inc. have agreed to pay $16.2 million to settle claims that they misled shareholders about the company’s future prospects while reaping $615 million from sales of the company’s stock.

The settlement was filed Thursday in Delaware Chancery Court. If approved, it would resolve claims that several Toll Brothers directors — including co-founders Robert and Bruce Toll — went to great lengths to convince investors that the company was uniquely positioned to weather a downturn in the housing market according to a 2008 lawsuit filed by Toll Brother shareholder Milton Pfeiffer. Read more…

Judge grants preliminary approval to second attempt by Facebook to settle privacy class action

Posted on: December 17th, 2012 by Steve Larson

U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg in California rejected a settlement in August over Facebook’s ‘Sponsored Stories’ advertising feature, questioning why it did not award money to Facebook users for using their personal information.

But in a ruling handed down Monday, Seeborg said a revised settlement “falls within the range of possible approval as fair, reasonable and adequate.”  Read more…

Judge rejects Toshiba’s argument that Illinois Brick bars retailers case in LCD flat panel antitrust litigation

Posted on: December 14th, 2012 by Steve Larson

A California federal judge refused to nix a group of retailers’ price-fixing claims against a slew of electronics makers in the liquid crystal display panel multidistrict litigation, deciding the indirect purchaser plaintiffs aren’t barred by the US Supreme Court Illinois Brick or the Ninth Circuit’s ATM fee ruling from seeking antitrust damages.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston denied two motions for partial summary judgment filed by Toshiba Corp., LG Display Co. Ltd., AU Optronics Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and 10 other LCD makers, saying the Illinois Brick ruling and Ninth Circuit’s ATM fee ruling did not do away with the exception that indirect purchasers can bring Sherman Act Antitrust claims if there is a conspiracy or ownership ties between the manufacturers and the direct purchasers, which was a question of fact in those cases.

Judge certifies injunctive class action in AriZona Beverages “All Natural” class action

Posted on: December 13th, 2012 by Steve Larson

A federal court has agreed to certify a class of California consumers alleg­edly misled by representations that AriZona Iced Tea® is “Natural” because it contains the processed, man-made ingredients high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and citric acid. Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, No. 10-01139 RS (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., San Francisco Div., order entered November 27, 2012). But the court granted the certification motion “for the purpose of injunctive and declaratory relief only” thus foreclosing the recovery of “monetary damages, including restitution, refund, reimbursement and disgorgement.” Read more…

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.

About Class Actions:

About this blog

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

About the author

  • Steve Larson

  • Steve Larson
  • Steve Larson has been representing investors, consumers and employees in class actions in Oregon for over 20 years. He is a shareholder at the law firm of Stoll Berne in Portland, Oregon.
Follow stollberne on Twitter

Subscribe to this blog