Class Actions Blog

Starkist settles under-filled cans class action

Posted on: September 1st, 2015 by Steve Larson

Consumer ProtectionPeople who bought certain varieties of StarKist tuna could be eligible for $25 in cash or $50 worth of tuna, after the settlement of a class-action lawsuit. StarKist was accused of under-filling its five-ounce tuna cans.

Consumers are eligible if they bought any one of four varieties between February 2009 and October 2014: StarKist Chunk Light Tuna in Water, StarKist Chunk Light Tuna in Oil, StarKist Solid White Tuna in Water and StarKist Solid White Tuna in Oil.

The plaintiff, Patrick Hendricks, had independent testing done on the cans, determining that they had as much as 17.3 percent less tuna than the federally mandated minimum. StarKist must pay up to $8 million in cash and $4 million in food vouchers as part of the settlement in United States District Court in Northern California.

Consumers can file claims for the cash or tuna at tunalawsuit.com.

Court Appoints Stoll Berne as Liaison Counsel in Premera Blue Cross Data Breach Litigation

Posted on: August 24th, 2015 by Steve Larson

Data SecurityU.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon has appointed Keith Dubanevich, Steve Larson, and Mark Friel as liaison counsel to represent a putative class of Premera health plan subscribers. Read more…

Visa and Target settle data breach class action

Posted on: August 18th, 2015 by Steve Larson

Data SecurityVisa Inc. announced it reached an agreement with Target Corp. to reimburse credit card issuers up to $67 million for costs related to the massive data breach the retailer disclosed in 2013.  This settlement more than tripled the value of a previous settlement that failed to gain enough support from the banks involved.

Class action over mortgage backed securities settles for $235 million

Posted on: August 17th, 2015 by Steve Larson

StockExchangeOn July 31, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla approved a $235 million class action settlement involving Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., and UBS Securities LLC, over mortgage-backed certificates issued by Residential Accredit Loans, Inc. (“RALI”). Read more…

7th Circuit changes course and rules full settlement offer does not moot class action

Posted on: August 12th, 2015 by Steve Larson

Law and justice concept, gavelThe Seventh Circuit changed course last week when it ruled that a defendant’s offer of full relief does not render a plaintiff’s claims moot, overturning circuit precedent and reviving a plaintiff’s individual claims in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act suit.  The issue arose in an appeal by Arnold Chapman, whose proposed class action against First Index Inc. over allegedly unauthorized junk faxes was shut down by a district court. While the three-judge panel upheld the lower court’s denial of leave to amend the suit, it ruled that the court should not have tossed Chapman’s individual claims just because he never accepted an offer of full relief from the defendant. The ruling aligned the Seventh with the Second, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits ahead of an upcoming Supreme Court ruling on the issue. Read more…

Seventh Circuit rejects commonly cited data breach defense

Posted on: August 6th, 2015 by Steve Larson

Data SecurityThe Seventh Circuit has held that Neiman Marcus customers affected by a hacking incident are likely to suffer some form of future fraud.  This should curtail defendants’ use of a Supreme Court ruling that plaintiffs suing over a potential injury must prove impending certainty.  With its decision, the Seventh Circuit became the first federal appeals court to address whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International — which held that plaintiffs suing over a future potential injury must show that it is “certainly impending” — applies in a data breach suit. Read more…

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.

About Class Actions:

About this blog

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

About the author

  • Steve Larson

  • Steve Larson
  • Steve Larson has been representing investors, consumers and employees in class actions in Oregon for over 20 years. He is a shareholder at the law firm of Stoll Berne in Portland, Oregon.
Follow stollberne on Twitter

Subscribe to this blog