Class Actions Blog

Jury awards whistleblower $2.1 million

Posted on: June 18th, 2013 by Steve Larson

Whistleblower Practice AreaA Jersey City man, who had been fired by Bayonne Medical Center, has been awarded more than $2.1 million after filing a lawsuit against the hospital under New Jersey’s whistleblower law.  The whistleblower, Ceferino Doculan, was given $2 million in punitive damages, $80,000 in lost wages and $60,000 for pain and suffering.  Doculan, who had been employed by the hospital for over 20 years, was fired after informing his superiors that his direct supervisor was not qualified and did not have the proper credentials for the position.

Doculan contended that he was fired because of his protected complaint and the hospital contended he had not been, but deserved to be fired. The jury apparently didn’t agree that the predominant reason for his discharge was his performance, and found the predominant reason was his protected conduct.

Papa John’s settles Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action

Posted on: June 17th, 2013 by Steve Larson

No spamPapa John’s agreed to settle its Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) lawsuit last week. The pizza chain had been facing the largest fine ever for violations of the TCPA in history, but settled with the plaintiffs on Friday.  The complaint alleged that the pizza chain sent a total of 500,000 unwanted text marketing messages without obtaining consent first, as required by the TCPA. The law allows for penalties up to $1,500 per unsolicited text message if a defendant is found to have willfully broken the law. Read more…

Supreme Court ruling in Oxford Health Plans v. Sutter allows class arbitration to proceed

Posted on: June 14th, 2013 by Keith Dubanevich

Supreme Court BlogIn Oxford Health Plans v Sutter, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an arbitrator has the power to interpret an arbitration clause and unless the agreement states otherwise, the arbitrator can construe the clause to permit class arbitrations.  The case was brought in state court by a physician who alleged that the health plan had failed to fully and promptly pay him and other physicians.  The health plan moved to compel arbitration which the state court ordered.  The arbitrator then construed the arbitration clause to permit class arbitration.  The health plan then filed in federal court a motion to vacate the arbitration order asserting that the arbitrator exceeded his authority.  The district court denied the motion and the Third Circuit affirmed.  The unanimous Supreme Court ruling holds that arbitrators have the power to construe arbitration clauses as permitting class arbitration.  The decision thus clears the way for cases to proceed as class arbitrations.

Computer Sciences Corp. settles securities class action for $97.5 million

Posted on: June 12th, 2013 by Steve Larson

Stocks and sharesComputer Sciences Corp. (CSC) avoided an imminent trial scheduled for May 21 by agreeing to pay $97.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit.  The lawsuit, filed on behalf of investors who acquired Computer Sciences common stock from August 5, 2008, to December 27, 2011 alleged that CSC filed false financial statements with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and failed to disclose material facts including the company’s performance on a $5.4 billion electronic patient records contract with the U.K.’s National Health Service. 

The proposed settlement is subject to approval by a judge.

Schwab gives up on class action waiver

Posted on: June 11th, 2013 by Steve Larson

Class Actions Practice Area urlCharles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) has reversed course on a requirement that customers must waive their right to participate in class action lawsuits against the company.

On its website, the San Francisco discount brokerage said it’s “modifying its account agreements to eliminate the existing class action lawsuit waiver for disputes” related to events that occur on or after May 15 and “for the foreseeable future.”

Schwab initially added the class action waiver provision in September 2011. The provision requires that all disputes between Schwab and its customers be hashed out in arbitration. Read more…

$203 million verdict against Wells Fargo in excessive overdraft case reinstated

Posted on: June 10th, 2013 by Steve Larson

FeeU.S. District Judge William Alsup reinstated on Tuesday a penalty he first imposed in August 2010, saying the fourth-largest U.S. bank violated a California law that protects consumers against fraudulent misrepresentations. 

The lawsuit is separate from nationwide litigation still pending in Miami federal court against about 20 lenders, including Wells Fargo, over alleged excessive overdraft fees.

Consumers often incur the roughly $25 or $35 fees when they overdraw their checking accounts through debit card purchases. Read more…

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.

About Class Actions:

About this blog

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

About the authors

  • Steve Larson

  • Steve Larson
  • Steve Larson has been representing investors, consumers and employees in class actions in Oregon for over 20 years. He is a shareholder at the law firm of Stoll Berne in Portland, Oregon.
  • Keith Dubanevich

  • Steve Larson
  • Keith Dubanevich has extensive experience handling antitrust, consumer and securities cases. Until joining the Portland, Oregon law firm Stoll Berne as a shareholder, he was the Associate Attorney General and Chief of Staff at the Oregon Department of Justice.
Follow stollberne on Twitter

Subscribe to this blog